Representatives García, Hoyle, and Khanna Reintroduce Legislation to Ban Stock Buybacks (2024)

WASHINGTON, DC Today, Representatives Jesús "Chuy" García (IL-04), Ro Khanna (CA-17), and Val Hoyle (OR-04) reintroduced the Reward Work Act to ban stock buybacks and increase worker power.


The Reward Work Act reins in stock buybacks by repealing a Reagan-era Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) loophole that allows corporations to buy back their stock on the open market. This legislation also empowers workers by requiring public companies to allow workers to directly elect one-third of their company’s board of directors.

“Stock buybacks were considered market manipulation, and therefore illegal, until Reagan-era market deregulation. Companies buy shares of their own stock to enrich shareholders instead of increasing wages or investing in better goods and services,” said Rep. García. “Last year, companies spent $1.2 trillion on buybacks as worker wages barely kept pace with inflation. It’s time we stop allowing corporate executives to make millions by buying back their own stock while workers and consumers pay the price.

“Prior to 1982, stock buybacks were considered illegal stock manipulation, but President Reagan's Securities and Exchange Commission implemented a rule to exempt them. Since then, we’ve seen corporations spending money on boosting their own stock at the expense of investing in innovation and their workforce, increasing wages, or lowering prices. Over the past year, Big Oil companies and other industries drove up costs for consumers while rewarding their shareholders with buybacks. It’s time to put a stop to this greed. I'm proud to join Reps. García and Hoyle as a cosponsor of the Reward Work Act to repeal this rule that has only exacerbated inequality in our country," said Rep. Khanna.

“I am proud to co-lead the Reward Work Act with Representatives García and Khanna. Stock buybacks are the epitome of corporate greed,” said Rep. Hoyle. “Corporate executives are skimming money off the top to put in their own pockets as opposed to investing it back in America, our communities, and their workforce.”

"Rampant use of stock buybacks is a way big corporations serve the short-term interests of Wall Street instead of the interests of workers, communities, the planet, and people saving for retirement. By requiringa third of board members to be elected by workers and getting rid of a 1982 loophole that opened the floodgates to corporations spending trillions of dollars on stock buybacks, the Reward Work Act would create the conditions for addressing our ever-expanding economic inequality and the racial wealth gap,” said Natalia Renta, Senior Policy Counsel, Americans for Financial Reform.

“We've seen time and time again that companies spend huge sums on stock buybacks, while refusing to give their workers their fair share. Companies like Apple have used company earnings not to invest in better equipment or operations or to pass along gains to workers, but to buy back hundreds of billions of dollars in stock to enrich the CEOs and wealthy shareholders. Workers are the backbone of any company's success. The Reward Work Act will help ensure that companies increase worker pay and benefits, invest in new equipment, or expand into new markets and create more jobs,” said Dan Mauer, Director of Government Affairs, Communications Workers of America (CWA).

"Consensus is building. Corporate stock buybacks artificially inflate stock prices, put more money in the pockets of the wealthy, harm workers, and widen the racial wealth gap. It’s time we get rid of them and ensure that companies reinvest profits that were created by labor into higher wages, better products, and long-term growth. Take On Wall Street is proud to support the Reward Work Act," said Jessica Church, Advocacy and Political Manager, Take On Wall Street.

“There’s an expert missing from the boards of big corporations in America. That expert is the worker who spends countless hours in stores and facilities powering the corporation’s profits. The one who manages operations and troubleshoots problems to keep things running. The one who balances customer satisfaction and employee well-being. The one who is also struggling to put food on the table and save for retirement. Working people like me have a vested interest in seeing the corporations we work at thrive, which means investing in us. Walmart’s billion dollars in stock buybacks could have given Walmart workers a liveable wage so that we aren’t relying on public assistance to make ends met. We know that in order to truly thrive, board members have to deliver more than empty promises and blanket policies that serve no purpose. Our valuable input and solutions are needed at the decision-making table to rein in corporate greed and prioritize workers,” said Cyndi Murray, Founding Member of United for Respect and longtime Walmart Associate

“Big US-based fashion companies like Nike left millions of low-wage garment workers in their supply chain across Asia in crisis after their purchasing practices during the pandemic caused massive income losses and wage theft,” said Anannya Bhattacharjee, International Coordinator of the Asia Floor Wage Alliance (AFWA). “As business rebounded, Big Fashion executives focused on enriching themselves and their shareholders with billions of dollars in stock buybacks instead of paying workers the income they lost. AFWA, Global Labor Justice - International Labor Rights Forum (GLJ-ILRF), and unions across Asia launched the Fight the Heist Campaign to demand these companies take responsibility for their global supply chains and pay living wages to the workers who make their products. That's why garment supply chain workers are linking arms with U.S. workers in calling out Wall Street and supporting the Reward Work Act – it is critical in the fight to win fair pay for workers in the U.S. and around the world.”

The following Members are original cosponsors of the Reward Work Act: Representatives: Jamaal Bowman (NY-16), Cori Bush (MO-01), André Carson (IN-07), Greg Casar (TX-35), Rosa DeLauro (CT-03), Chris Deluzio (PA-17), Mark DeSaulnier (CA-10), Maxwell Alejandro Frost (FL-10), Raúl M. Grijalva (AZ-07), Sheila Jackson Lee (TX-18), Pramila Jayapal (WA-07), Henry C. "Hank" Johnson, Jr. (GA-04), Greg Landsman (OH-01), Barbara Lee (CA-12), Summer Lee (PA-12), Ted W. Lieu (CA-36), Betty McCollum (MN-04), Jim McGovern (MA-02), Donald Norcross (NJ-01), Eleanor Holmes Norton (DC-01), Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (NY-14), Ilhan Omar (MN-05), Mark Pocan (WI-02), Katie Porter (CA-47), Jan Schakowsky (IL-09), Rashida Tlaib (MI-12), Bonnie Watson Coleman (NJ-12).

This legislation is supported by the following organizations: AFL-CIO, American for Financial Reform (AFR), Association of Flight Attendants-CWA, Communication Workers of America (CWA), Groundwork Collaborative, Indivisible, Institute for Policy Studies Global Economy Project, NETWORK Lobby for Catholic Social Justice, Public Citizen, SEIU, Take on Wall Street, United for Respect, Woodstock Institute.

The text of the bill can be found here.

Photos from the press conference can be found here.

###

Representatives García, Hoyle, and Khanna Reintroduce Legislation to Ban Stock Buybacks (2024)

FAQs

Were we're stock buybacks ever illegal? ›

For most of the 20th century, stock buybacks were deemed illegal because they were thought to be a form of stock market manipulation. But since 1982, when they were essentially legalized by the SEC, buybacks have become perhaps the most popular financial engineering tool in the C-Suite tool shed.

What is the new law for stock buybacks? ›

The Inflation Reduction Act imposed a new excise tax on stock repurchases equal to one percent of the aggregate fair market value of stock repurchased by certain corporations during the taxable year, subject to adjustments. The stock repurchase excise tax applies to repurchases after Dec. 31, 2022.

Who approves stock buybacks? ›

Typically, a company will announce that its board of directors has approved a “repurchase authorization.” The announcement will include details like the percentage of the shares on the open market the company intends to buy back, or the amount of money the business will spend on the buybacks.

Should companies be allowed to buy back their own stock? ›

With a buyback, the company can increase earnings per share, all else equal. The same earnings pie cut into fewer slices is worth a greater share of the earnings. By reducing share count, buybacks increase the stock's potential upside for shareholders who want to remain owners.

What did Warren Buffett say about stock buybacks? ›

OMAHA, Neb. (AP) — Billionaire Warren Buffett said critics of stock buybacks are “either an economic illiterate or a silver-tongued demagogue” or both, and all investors benefit from them as long as they are made at the right prices.

What is the problem with stock buybacks? ›

Critics of buybacks typically make three arguments against the practice. First, they claim that share repurchases enable companies to manipulate the market either by increasing the demand for — and therefore the price of — shares or by tricking naive investors by inflating earnings per share (EPS).

What president allowed stock buybacks? ›

“Prior to 1982, stock buybacks were considered illegal stock manipulation, but President Reagan's Securities and Exchange Commission implemented a rule to exempt them.

What is a stock buyback and why is it controversial? ›

Buybacks can artificially inflate a stock's price and EPS even if a company's revenue or earnings performance is poor or weaker than expected. That's why some people view buybacks as a form of price manipulation that can easily misguide investors. Higher debt-to-equity ratio.

What happens to stock price after buyback? ›

The benefits of a buyback include an increase in earnings per share (EPS) since the same earnings are divided among fewer shares, potentially boosting the stock price. This can lead to higher returns for investors who hold onto their shares post buyback.

Who benefits most from stock buybacks? ›

A buyback can benefit investors because they receive their capital back and are often paid a premium over the stock's market price. In addition, there is a boost in the share price for investors who still hold onto the stock; however, buybacks aren't necessarily always good for investors.

What are the disadvantages of share buybacks? ›

Disadvantages. A criticism of buybacks is that they are often ill-timed. A company will buy back shares when it has plenty of cash or during a period of financial health for the company and the stock market. The stock price of a company is likely to be high at such times, and the price might drop after a buyback.

Which companies are buying back their stock in 2024? ›

Best Stocks for Buybacks of May 2024
Stock (ticker)Shareholder yield
ExlService Holdings (EXLS)2.7%
Mastercard (MA)2.6%
Marsh & McLennan (MMC)2.3%
Intuit (INTU)1.8%
6 more rows
4 days ago

Why are the rich selling their stocks? ›

In mid-2023, news began to spread about the world's super-rich reducing their ownership of shares in public companies. The reason behind this move is to secure their wealth amidst rising interest rates and economic uncertainty. Similar issues are still ongoing to this day.

Why were stock buybacks illegal? ›

For most of the 20th century, stock buybacks were deemed illegal because they were thought to be a form of stock market manipulation.

Do stock buybacks destroy shares? ›

A share buyback is when companies buy back their own shares from the market, cancel them and, ultimately, reduce share capital. With fewer shares in circulation, each shareholder gets both a larger stake in the company and a higher return on future dividends.

When did stock buybacks become legal in the US? ›

For most of the 20th century, stock buybacks were deemed illegal because they were thought to be a form of stock market manipulation. But since 1982, when they were essentially legalized by the SEC, buybacks have become perhaps the most popular financial engineering tool in the C-Suite tool shed.

When were companies allowed to buy back stock? ›

Until 1982, buybacks were uncommon and generally considered a form of market manipulation. But when the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) adopted rule 10b-18 that year, it gave large companies a “safe harbor” to buy back stocks.

Were stock buybacks considered stock manipulation prior to 1982? ›

Reminder that before 1982, stock buybacks were considered stock manipulation. Reagan's SEC opened the floodgates to their abuse. Stock buybacks don't create more jobs. They don't increase wages.

Are buybacks legal? ›

Nonetheless, stock buybacks are controversial because they can arguably be viewed as market manipulation. As a result, a company wishing to engage in repurchasing their own shares must follow the procedures and regulations outlined in Security Exchange Commission rule 10b-18.

Top Articles
Discount grocer tops list of nation's fastest-growing grocers in 2023
TGTX Forecast — Price Target — Prediction for 2025 — TradingView
Funny Roblox Id Codes 2023
Golden Abyss - Chapter 5 - Lunar_Angel
Www.paystubportal.com/7-11 Login
Joi Databas
DPhil Research - List of thesis titles
Shs Games 1V1 Lol
Evil Dead Rise Showtimes Near Massena Movieplex
Steamy Afternoon With Handsome Fernando
Which aspects are important in sales |#1 Prospection
Detroit Lions 50 50
18443168434
Zürich Stadion Letzigrund detailed interactive seating plan with seat & row numbers | Sitzplan Saalplan with Sitzplatz & Reihen Nummerierung
Grace Caroline Deepfake
978-0137606801
Nwi Arrests Lake County
Justified Official Series Trailer
London Ups Store
Committees Of Correspondence | Encyclopedia.com
Pizza Hut In Dinuba
Jinx Chapter 24: Release Date, Spoilers & Where To Read - OtakuKart
Obsidian Guard's Cutlass
Marvon McCray Update: Did He Pass Away Or Is He Still Alive?
Mccain Agportal
Amih Stocktwits
Fort Mccoy Fire Map
Uta Kinesiology Advising
Kcwi Tv Schedule
What Time Does Walmart Auto Center Open
Nesb Routing Number
Olivia Maeday
Random Bibleizer
10 Best Places to Go and Things to Know for a Trip to the Hickory M...
Black Lion Backpack And Glider Voucher
Gopher Carts Pensacola Beach
Duke University Transcript Request
Lincoln Financial Field, section 110, row 4, home of Philadelphia Eagles, Temple Owls, page 1
Jambus - Definition, Beispiele, Merkmale, Wirkung
Netherforged Lavaproof Boots
Ark Unlock All Skins Command
Craigslist Red Wing Mn
D3 Boards
Jail View Sumter
Nancy Pazelt Obituary
Birmingham City Schools Clever Login
Thotsbook Com
Funkin' on the Heights
Vci Classified Paducah
Www Pig11 Net
Ty Glass Sentenced
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Ms. Lucile Johns

Last Updated:

Views: 6467

Rating: 4 / 5 (61 voted)

Reviews: 92% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Ms. Lucile Johns

Birthday: 1999-11-16

Address: Suite 237 56046 Walsh Coves, West Enid, VT 46557

Phone: +59115435987187

Job: Education Supervisor

Hobby: Genealogy, Stone skipping, Skydiving, Nordic skating, Couponing, Coloring, Gardening

Introduction: My name is Ms. Lucile Johns, I am a successful, friendly, friendly, homely, adventurous, handsome, delightful person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.